The 5 Best Reverse Osmosis Systems of 2021

Water is an everyday necessity. Many people in the world make use of water that contains harmful substances to their health. These harmful contaminants in water put people at risk of developing very severe health conditions. There are ways to avoid this, and one of those ways is through a reverse osmosis water filter system.

Reverse osmosis systems are put in place for the sole purpose of purifying and cleansing water. It is a filtration system that separates dirt, harmful substances, and unwanted particles from water. Using a reverse osmosis system reduces the contents and substances in water that may be harmful to you or your immediate environment.

The best reverse osmosis systems use filters to separate the particles and harmful contents from the water, leaving you with clean, healthy, and desirable water. They apply pressure during the purification process, and this process ensures that about 98% of your water is free from any of these contaminants.

The Top 5 RO Systems Online:

  1. Waterdrop Reverse Osmosis Water Filter System
  2. AquaTru Reverse Osmosis System
  3. Waterdrop Tankless Reverse Osmosis System
  4. Crystal Quest Ultrafiltration and Reverse Osmosis System
  5. Home Master TMHP HydroPerfection Reverse Osmosis System

Why a Reverse Osmosis System Is a Necessity

About 29% of the world’s population does not have access to safe and clean water. It is one of the biggest and most worrying environmental statistics in the world. A reverse osmosis system guarantees that you get access to safe and clean water for different purposes, such as for bathing, cooking, or drinking.

A reverse osmosis system reduces the arsenic level in your water. Arsenic is a compound that is found on the earth, and it is especially harmful to individuals in its inorganic form. The level of arsenic in your water may be dependent on your source of water.

People with private wells in their homes, communities, or businesses may experience or detect a high concentration of arsenic present in their water. Also, in some countries, including the United States of America, there is a high concentration of arsenic in groundwater.

The constant exposure to harmful substances in your water, including arsenic, may put you at risk of many health concerns later in the future. Some of these risks include various types of cancers such as skin cancer, lung cancer, or throat cancer.

Unfortunately, arsenic is not the only harmful content that may be present in your water. There are other viruses and bacteria in your water that may endanger your health and the health of your loved ones. 

Using a reverse osmosis system puts you at ease. Knowing that you are not exposed to the health risks that may arise as a result of using unclean and unsafe water is stress-relieving. A reverse osmosis system ensures that your drinking water is safe and purifies your water for other purposes, such as cooking.

We utilize a lot of water while cooking, and it is important to use only purified water. Hence, a reverse osmosis system guarantees that your food is prepared using only safe, clean, and purified water.

The reverse osmosis system uses several cleaning processes while filtering your water. Within these stages, it gets rid of solid and dissolved particles like sand or stone that may be present in your water.

A reverse osmosis system also reduces the activities of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other harmful organisms. To further guarantee your health, it keeps all the essential minerals that are present in your water. Reverse osmosis does not get rid of these essential minerals during the filtration process.

Do You Need a RO System?

About 140 million people in 50 countries are exposed to arsenic in their water.

More than two million people in the United States of America are at risk of developing severe health conditions because of exposure to the harmful content in their water.

A reverse osmosis system reduces your chances of being a part of these disturbing statistics. It provides you with clean and safe water to use for your daily activities in your home, community, and company.

You need a reverse osmosis system if you are trying to avoid contracting any water-borne diseases. These water-borne diseases occur as a result of impurities that are in water and include cholera, typhoid, dysentery, and a host of other gastrointestinal ailments.

One way to mitigate these water-borne diseases is to ensure that you have a purification system for your water, and the reverse osmosis system is an excellent choice to combat such an issue. As a matter of fact, if many developing countries had an adequate supply of purified water, it would prevent the constant outbreak of waterborne diseases in these locations.

Also, with a reverse osmosis water filter system installed in your house, you can save money by not purchasing bottled water anymore. Your reverse osmosis system gives you the same purified quality (or even better) than most bottled waters.

If you desire purified and healthy water, then you need a reverse osmosis system.

There are various reverse osmosis systems that are available for you to choose from, depending on different criteria. These reverse osmosis systems vary on different accounts, including costs and product details. Some of them have distinct stages for the purification process, while others have less detailed steps.

There are many different price ranges for the reverse osmosis systems that are available. There are also quite different technologies used in the making of many of these systems.

Some of them require electricity to function, while others do not. Many reverse osmosis systems can have a part of their storage facility placed under the sink to save space and further improve your comfort and physical safety in the house.

This part of the article discusses five reverse osmosis systems, with a specific focus on product description, advantages, and disadvantages.

One similarity we observed in all of these five different reverse osmosis systems is that they are easy to set up and maintain. You do not need to be technologically savvy to install them. 

If at some point you are stuck and you need help, you can easily watch any of the many easy installation tutorials available online.

Best Reverse Osmosis Water Systems 

Editor’s Choice

The Waterdrop reverse osmosis system is another excellent choice to ensure that you are safe from unclean and harmful components in your water. It allows you to remove almost a hundred percent of all contaminants in your water.

The Waterdrop reverse osmosis system is suitable for you if you are a heavy consumer of water. It has the storage capacity to hold up to four hundred gallons of water. On top of its easy installation, the Waterdrop reverse osmosis system has a seven-stage purification process that gets rid of almost all contaminants in your water.

 It is an excellent choice for many because it does not consume much space in the house, as it has a part of its storage buried beneath the sink. The Waterdrop reverse osmosis water filter system requires electricity to run and function.

Despite all these great features, you can still purchase the Waterdrop reverse osmosis water system for a little over $500. 

Pros:

  • It is certified by NSF international as suitable for general public health.
  • You can get it for a little over $500.
  • The Waterdrop reverse osmosis system contains up to 400 gallons of water. This is a plus for people who consume water heavily on a daily basis.
  • It comes with an installation guide to assist you with setting it up in your home by yourself.
  • It has a seven-stage purification process. These different stages ensure that your water goes through a highly rigorous filtration process, leaving you with nothing but healthy water to last you through the day.
  • It improves the quality of your water’s taste and ensures that you do not get any funny taste in your water.
  • It has a very fast water flow that ensures you can fill up your glass in less than a minute. This makes it suitable for use during emergency occasions.
  • It informs you of your water quality and instructs you on how to proceed.
  • It conserves space as about half of the water content is buried under your sink. 
  • The Waterdrop reverse osmosis system is very easy to use and maintain. If you require any help during maintenance, you can easily make use of the many resources available online to guide you.
  • It prevents leakage by turning off the power supply whenever it detects a leak.

Cons:

  • The Waterdrop reverse osmosis system requires electricity to run successfully. Without it connected to a functional electrical system, you cannot get access to water.
  • This reverse osmosis water system comes with just two filters. Luckily though, you may not need to change the filter until after six months of use.
  • Some people may find the Waterdrop reverse osmosis water filter system is a bit more expensive compared to other reverse osmosis systems.

Click here to Get the Waterdrop filter from the Official Website.

With this reverse osmosis aquatic system, you, in the very comfort of your house, have the same reverse osmosis technologies used in many established water companies. 

The AquaTru system is a top choice for many people who are conscious of the environment and the dangers that plastic water bottles may cause.

Luckily, it is very easy to install. If there is a need for guidance, there are videos available online to help you through the installation process. Although it only has a four-stage purification process, the AquaTru system still produces clean and healthy water for your personal consumption.

Another feature of the AquaTru reverse osmosis system is that it also removes some harmless components in water during filtration. For example, it removes calcium, which is the main mineral present in your body system. It is responsible for developing your muscles and maintaining a functional nervous system.

The AquaTru system does not cost as much as other reverse osmosis water filter systems. It can be purchased for less than $500. Along with an easy setup, it also does not take up much space in your house. 

Due to its small size, it has a low storage capacity. The AquaTru system can only hold about a gallon of water at a time. It may not be suitable for you if you heavily consume water daily. It also does not fill up easily, making it unsuitable for emergency purposes.

Pros:

  • You get clean water from your house with the same quality as the water produced by any respected water bottling company.
  • It reduces your need for bottled water, hence, helping the environment.
  • It can be easily set up. You do not need pre-existing technical knowledge before setting it up in your home.
  • It is considerably cheap. With a little over $400, you can get yourself a reverse osmosis AquaTru system, and it will be shipped to you promptly.
  • It has a 4-step process that guarantees a rigorous cleansing and purification process for your water.
  • The reverse osmosis AquaTru system is compact. Its design ensures that it only encompasses a small part of your home. A simple countertop in your kitchen will do just fine.
  • The AquaTru reverse osmosis system goes out of its way to fulfill more than the standard requirements for purification. It gets rid of more than 80% of harmful content in your water.
  • The AquaTru reverse osmosis system has various filters included, and an inbuilt digital reminder that notifies you when it is time to change your filters.

Cons:

  • One of the downsides of the AquaTru reverse osmosis system is that it is small. It can take only up to a gallon of water at a time. Some people drink about a half-gallon of water a day, and some consume as much as a gallon of water per day. Due to its small size, the AquaTru reverse osmosis system does not make enough provisions for their needs.
  • It takes about ten minutes to refill. This makes it unsuitable for use in an emergency or for immediate relief of severe thirst.
  • As much as the AquaTru reverse osmosis system gets rid of a high percentage of the harmful content present in your water, it also gets rid of some healthy components, such as calcium. Many of these components have health benefits. 

Click here to Get the AquaTru system from the Official Website.

The Waterdrop Tankless reverse osmosis system is another water filter system that is suitable for your personal use in the house. You should note that this is the cheapest reverse osmosis system available. However, the cost of the Tankless reverse osmosis system is not the only interesting feature.

It also has the storage capacity to hold up to four hundred gallons of water.

The Tankless reverse osmosis system is very easy to install. If you require any help along the way, there are videos online that will guide you through the process. It also does not take up much space, as more than half of its storage space is placed beneath your sink.

Pros:

  • It is incredibly cheap. With just $300, you can purchase the Tankless reverse osmosis system.
  • It holds about four hundred gallons of water, enough to satisfy your daily needs, at any time of the day.
  • Its tankless design ensures that it does not take a lot of space in your house. More than 50% of the storage space is beneath your sink. This design also ensures that there is no harmful growth forming in the tank.
  • The Tankless reverse osmosis system does not require a tedious installation process.
  • It can remove as much as 99% of unsafe particles in your water.
  • It also saves time by filling up your glass of water in less than a minute.

Cons

  • It requires electricity to function.
  • It makes a bit of noise when dispensing water.

Click here to get the Waterdrop Tankless RO system from the Official Site.

As a company, Crystal Quest understands how highly important clean and safe water is to everyone. Hence, their product, which holds up to four hundred gallons of water, ensures that you never run out of healthy water. The Crystal Quest ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis system can be easily installed in your home without any technical knowledge.

A distinct feature of the Crystal Quest ultrafiltration water filter system is that it makes special and distinct arrangements for both hot and cold water. This system stops heating water when it reaches the highest heating point. It has separate tanks for hot and cold water that can be easily cleaned and maintained.

The Crystal Quest ultrafiltration system also works on the taste of the water. For example, it will eliminate the taste of chlorine in your water. This water filter system is on the pricey side, compared to other water filter systems. It costs about $1,000.

Pros:

  • It is simple to install. It does not require any extreme technical knowledge during the installation process.
  • It has different hot and cold-water functions, such as a separate switch for both water temperatures.
  • The Crystal Quest ultrafiltration system can automatically discontinue heating water when the temperature reaches the highest level.
  • You can easily clean and maintain it.
  • It has separate tanks for both hot and cold water.
  • This water filter also works on the taste of your water, and it ensures that you do not, for example, taste chlorine in your water.
  • The filters can be easily replaced. 
  • The filters can last as long as six months.
  • The Crystal Quest ultrafiltration system has a five-stage purification process that ensures you get the best water quality.

Cons:

  • It may be considered expensive for personal use, compared to other reverse osmosis water systems. It costs almost $1,000.

Click here to Get the Crystal Quest Ultrafiltration System.

With this excellent reverse osmosis system that performs considerably better than other available water filter systems, you are guaranteed to have access to safe and harmless water. The Home Master system has a nine-stage purification process that ensures the water you use is at least 98% free from harmful contaminants.

This nine-stage purification process performs better than other water filter systems with a lesser number of purification stages. It also adds minerals such as calcium to your water. The Home Master system has different filters for different types of contaminants.

For example, it has a separate filter that is designed to get rid of particles such as sand. An interesting feature of this reverse osmosis system is that it makes use of ultraviolet light when purifying the water. It also does not require electricity to operate.

Another fascinating thing to note about the Home Master system is that it has long-lasting filters that can endure up to a year before they require you to change them.

Pros:

  • It has a considerably better reverse osmosis system compared to other water filter systems.
  • The Home Master TMHP HydroPerfection reverse osmosis system has standard certification ***
  • Unlike other reverse osmosis systems that get rid of essential substances in water, the home master TMHP HydroPerfection reverse osmosis system adds these essential substances such as calcium, magnesium, and others to water.
  • It comes with a nine-stage filtration process, which, compared to other reverse osmosis systems, performs better and ensures that your water is 98% free from harmful contaminants.
  • It contains a separate filter for large particles like sand or stones.
  • It does not require electricity to operate.
  • It is designed in a way that reduces water wastage.
  • It makes use of ultraviolet light in its purification process.
  • It has last-longing filters. The filters can persist as long as twelve months.
  • The Home Master TMHP HydroPerfection reverse osmosis system can hold more than three gallons of water in its tank. It fills up by itself when the purified water is exhausted.

Cons:

  • This reverse osmosis system may sometimes not fit under the sink storage area. Hence, it is advisable that you measure your storage area before you make a purchase.
  • The Home Master TMHP HydroPerfection reverse osmosis system may be considered costly, especially when compared to other water filter systems. On Amazon, you may purchase it for a little over $500.

Click here to Get the Home Master Reverse Osmosis System from the Official Site.

Buyer’s Guide: What to Look for in a Reverse Osmosis System

Having a water filter in your house is one of the best decisions you can make. The most expensive water filter system may not be the most efficient water filter system available. Also, it may not be the one that is suitable for your specific needs.

Moving on, there are certain things you must look out for before deciding on which water filter to get.

These tips will guide you in making the best purchase for your home and health:

  • Storage: Different houses have varying needs for water. A smaller household may not need or consume as much water as a larger household will. Hence, when selecting the water filter that is suitable for your house, you should consider how much water you consume and how much water a particular water filter can hold. How much water you consume will guide you in choosing which water filter is right for you.
  • Filters: Some reverse osmosis systems have different filters available for you to use. Some of these filters are specially designed to get rid of a particular contaminant. You can conduct a test on your water source to find out what the major contaminants are. It will help you select which water filter system to get, with special reference to its type of filters.
  • Purification process: When considering which water filter to buy, you should check how much of these contaminants it removes from your water. You should get a water filter that removes up to 98% of unwanted substances and particles from your water.
  • Water quality: A good water filter should not only remove impurities but also improve the water taste. It should retain the essential components that may be found in your water.
  • Cost: The cost of a water filter is another thing that will guide you in making the right choice. You should consider your budget before selecting which water filter to buy. You should also consider the costs of other things like delivery, installation, and maintenance.

Which Type of RO Water Filter Should You Get?

The following tips will guide you in making the right choice for a water filter in your home:

  • Longevity: how long a water filter can last is a major consideration to look into when determining the type of filter to purchase. The most essential thing is to purchase a filter that can last longer while being affordable.
  • Level of consumption: Although getting a cheap filter may seem cost-effective, it can get damaged quickly, especially if you are a heavy consumer. The level of your consumption will determine the type of filter to get. You do not need an excessively long-lasting filter if you do not consume water heavily.

Also check: Best Water Softener on The Market

Reverse Osmosis Systems Installation & Maintenance

Many of these water filter systems can be easily installed, so you do not have to worry about the installation process. Some of these water filter systems come with notes on how to install and maintain them.

Also, there are tons of videos available online to guide you through the installation and maintenance process. However, here is a simple guide on how you can install a house water filter easily in your house, without stress.

  • Disconnect your former water supply system.
  • Empty your former water supply system of all contents.
  • Determine the location for your newly purchased water filter system. When doing this, you should consider an easily accessible spot or location since it will be used frequently.
  • Use a cutter (specifically a pipe cutter) for your pipe.
  • Install the nuts, bolts, and all fittings following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. This is usually included with your water filter system. Make sure you use strong tape for anything that requires taping.
  • Put the filters in, making sure each is in its right spot. You can cross-reference with the installation manual that comes with your water filter system.
  • After confirming that everything has been done well, turn on your water supply.
  • Inspect for any leaks. This step is remarkably important, especially if your water filter system requires electricity to function. Confirming this prevents any household accidents, such as slips, falls, shocks, or fires.
  • There you go, with your newly installed water filter system that ensures you get a high-quality of water.

Just like installing a water filter system is simple, maintaining it requires no stress or pre-existing technical knowledge. In case you need extra help, there are also thousands of videos available online for you to learn from.

Maintaining a water filter system is as important as purchasing it. If you do not maintain it well, you are at risk of getting contaminated water. Bear in mind that one of the most important ways of maintaining your water filter system is to change the filters regularly. If you do not change your filters regularly, or when due, it becomes prone to harboring other harmful agents such as bacteria and dirt.

Here is a simple way that you can maintain your water filter system:

  • Before changing your filter, make sure you turn off and disengage the opening through which water comes from your supply into the water filter system.
  • Many water filter systems provide you with the tools you need when changing the filters. Use the required hand tool to unscrew all nuts, screws, and bolts that are holding the filters in place.
  • Make sure you have a bowl to collect any water that is remaining in the water filter system to prevent slips.
  • Clean the filter. You can easily clean the inside with something as simple as a cloth. Make sure it is clean. You do not want to transfer dirt, or other harmful substances, on your cloth to your filter.
  • Replace the filter using the provided tools.
  • Turn on or connect the opening through which water comes into the water filter system, which you disengaged earlier, at the beginning of the maintenance process.
  • Do not taste the water immediately after replacing the filter. Let the water run out through the new filter for as long as ten minutes. This ensures that you get safe water for use.

Conclusion: Is A Reverse Osmosis System Necessary?

In a world where many people do not have access to the basic amenity of clean water, reverse osmosis systems help to purify harmful water and make it clean and healthy. There are various reverse osmosis systems available that you can choose from. These different types suit different budgets, different storage needs, or different purification processes.

A reverse osmosis system removes dirt, unwanted particles, harmful organisms, unwanted growth, and other substances that are dangerous for you. It cleanses your water and makes it safe for use.

 

This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase products through these links Observer will earn a commission.

Best Reverse Osmosis Filter Systems: Reviews & Buying Guide



Source link

Obama-Biden Decide to Reverse Trump’s Actions and Send Hundreds of Millions to the Palestinians Because It Will Support “Israeli-Palestinian Stability”




Obama-Biden Decide to Reverse Trump’s Actions and Send Hundreds of Millions to the Palestinians Because It Will Support “Israeli-Palestinian Stability”



















Tap here to add The Western Journal to your home screen.





Source link

Job Creators Network calls for MLB to reverse the move to relocate the All-Star Game

A small business advocacy organization is calling for an about face after Major League Baseball Commissioner Robert Manfred, Jr. said last week that the All-Star Game and MLB Draft slated to occur in Atlanta, Georgia would be relocated.

The announcement came as an expression of opposition to election-related legislation recently approved in the Peach State: “Over the last week, we have engaged in thoughtful conversations with Clubs, former and current players, the Players Association, and The Players Alliance, among others, to listen to their views. I have decided that the best way to demonstrate our values as a sport is by relocating this year’s All-Star Game and MLB Draft,” Manfred said in a statement.

But Job Creators Network (JCN) President and CEO Alfredo Ortiz in a letter to Manfred called for the relocation decision to be reversed, writing that the move would deprive Atlanta of millions of dollars in tourism revenue and that the Georgia legislation “makes it easy to vote and hard to cheat.” The MLB dumped Atlanta and has shifted instead to the city of Denver, Colorado.

“The local government in Georgia — the predesignated location for the event — estimates the exit will amount to a loss of $100 million in tourism spending,” Ortiz wrote. “For small businesses that have disproportionately suffered through government-imposed pandemic lockdowns over the past year, the financial loss is a punch to the gut and will have an outsized impact on minority-owned businesses. As Sen. Tim Scott points out in a tweet, Atlanta has a majority African American population, while Denver boasts a nine percent make-up. Your decision is punishing the very group you claim to be defending. We demand that you reverse the decision,” the letter declares. 

The letter links to a tweet from South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, a black Republican, who wrote that “Atlanta is 51% black” and “Denver is 9.2% black.”

“On behalf of our members, JCN demands you reconsider your decision and return the All Star game back to the Peach State,” the JCN letter says. “Don’t let activist groups weaponize America’s pastime to push radical ideas that MLB fans don’t support.” 





Source link

Scientists Want to Reverse Trump’s Pro-Life Rules, Use Aborted Baby Parts in Experiments

While COVID-19 has consumed the attention and energies of the world for the last year, other bioethical and scientific challenges have not gone away and are set to burst back to the forefront this year. Significant advances were made in 2020 to move away from the antiquated science using human fetal tissue from abortion and toward development of modern techniques and biological models that do not use fetal tissue. However, a resurgence of research using trafficked aborted fetal body parts is likely with the new White House Administration. Calls have already been made to gut the current ethical regulations on federal funding of fetal tissue research. The drumbeat for taxpayer dollars to pay for experiments using fetal organs and tissues from abortion continues, trying to make use of the crisis to justify unethical research, e.g., making humanized “lung-only mice” to investigate COVID-19. In the meantime, adult stem cells have made “mini-lungs” in the lab that faithfully model normal lungs, and they are already being used to study COVID-19 infections and therapies.

It’s in fact dismaying how supposedly science-oriented organizations can blatantly put out such anti-science, false rhetoric and claims about fetal tissue, claims that have repeatedly been shown to be false. One medical society seems especially confused on the simple difference between a cell and a body organ or tissue, claiming that there are current federal funding restrictions on fetal cell lines (current regulations exclude cell lines from oversight and are only focused on funding of fetal tissue and organs from ongoing abortion.) Perhaps they need a basic biology reminder of the difference, or maybe a detailed scientific review article on the facts about fetal tissue research and its alternatives? It seems clear this is intentional obfuscation, aimed at hiding support for fetal tissue research from ongoing abortion. In fact, in its document, this society also advocates for dropping all federal prohibitions on human embryo research, increasing embryonic stem cell research, and removal of the current prohibition on heritable (germline) gene editing (which involves creating genetically engineered embryos and babies, and affects not just one individual but subsequent human generations as well.)

Follow LifeNews on the MeWe social media network for the latest pro-life news free from Facebook’s censorship!

The push for gene-edited embryos and babies has also come from prestigious groups such as the U.S. National Academies of Science, the U.K. Royal Society and the World Health Organization (WHO.) Over a year ago, these organizations were already aimed at moving heritable gene editing forward. Sadly, the COVID-19 crisis has not been a hindrance to their agenda. Despite the numerous calls noted over a year ago for an international moratorium on heritable gene editing, from distinguished scientists and ethicists around the globe, there is no plan to put such a moratorium into place, and no one has worked to foster the necessary discussions with all stakeholders on the future of heritable genome editing research. Instead, the International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing released a report on the “potential benefits, harms, and uncertainties” of heritable genome editing on human embryos. Their recommendations outline a path and steps needed to make human heritable genome editing a reality.

One of their recommendations was for countries to have a regulatory body to assess safety and ethics of heritable gene editing uses. As one writer notes, this puts the U.S. in a particularly vulnerable spot for abuse of heritable gene editing technology and ethics, because current likely candidates are professional organizations whose “guidance is voluntary and notoriously permissive, allowing procedures that other countries ban.”

The focus of concern for these groups is only what can be done under the limits of current law and technology, not whether heritable gene editing on human embryos should be done at all. Paving the way for application to human beings in the clinic, the International Commission acknowledged there was absolutely no suggestion of prohibiting this research despite the huge numbers of human embryos that would be used as experimental fodder. In a recent online discussion of their report and where this technology might proceed, members of the International Commission again admitted they did not consider a moratorium and did not suggest prohibiting research in this area, but they did think the technology is not ready…yet.

Great benefits could be derived from a patient-centered focus on gene editing, rather than an embryo-centered focus. Just one example is a recent report where genetic engineering strategies have repaired gene defects in two blood disorders. While these are early results and should be interpreted with caution, these and other trials using genetic techniques show great potential for ameliorating diseases.

Another reason for concern with the push for heritable gene editing and embryo research is the hubris shown by researchers who think they will easily rid the world of disease and death, if only they have enough embryos on which they can experiment. Yet the “practice runs” haven’t turned out well; definitely not for the embryos, who die in the experiments, but also for the experimenters. While it may sound easy to target specific genes and make genetic changes, published reports show it has deadly effect. Several papers now document “off-target” cutting (meaning that various other places in the genome are snipped), DNA deletions and chromosome rearrangements after attempts at embryo gene editing. One research group in particular, led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov, specifically created 175 human embryos with mutations in order to show they could fix the mutated genes. However, they discovered their attempts resulted in significant genetic alterations in the DNA of the experimental embryos. As a reminder, Mitalipov has stated his desire to gestate and birth some of these gene-edited children, and he is also the researcher who used his techniques to create cloned human embryos, created three-parent human embryos using cloning techniques and advocated for gestation and birth of three-parent embryos. One can only hope the disastrous results of these experiments will dampen his enthusiasm for embryo manipulation.

Another area about which to be concerned is attempts to create embryos and embryo-like models from stem cells, as well as the desire to grow embryos for longer times in the laboratoryResearchers have complained they are not receiving what they consider adequate taxpayer dollars for these areas and need clear guidelines so they can be funded and move the research forward. Of course, one key question is whether what is created is actually an embryo, or an embryo-like artifact that falls short of the definition, and whether that matters. At the request of the National Institutes of Health, the National Academies of Science quietly convened another panel to consider issues regarding ethical, legal and regulatory issues regarding embryoids and organoids. They also resurrected consideration of expanded creation of human-animal chimeras, a proposal made by NIH in 2016 which received numerous critical comments but was left undecided. It may be that this expansion of chimera research funding needed to wait for a more favorable federal climate, more positive reviews and a recommendation to proceed from a national scientific panel. It may not be long before the door opens wide for human-animal chimeras, human clones and their three-parent cousins, lab-created embryos and wholesale embryo experiments.



Source link

San Fransisco may reverse plan to rename public schools

San Francisco on Tuesday is expected to overturn its “offensive” plan to purge dozens of schools with names that its board of education claimed honor “racist” historical leaders.

The California city’s board of education in January had voted to strip 44 schools of the names of historic figures, including Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Robert Louis Stevenson. 

The decision sparked a huge backlash — as well as legal challenges for the decision being made without community input. 

The school board was also ridiculed for shoddy research and often wildly inaccurate claims linking school names to racism, sexism or other injustices.

Laurence Tribe, one of the attorneys involved in lawsuits against the plans, told the San Francisco Chronicle that he is “definitely on board that sometimes names ought not to be preserved.”

The main entry to George Washington High School in San Francisco.
AP Photo/Haven Daley

But “I think it goes dangerously far when the Great Emancipator is treated as insufficiently woke,” he said of attacks on Honest Abe.

Mayor London Breed also called it “offensive and completely unacceptable” for the board to focus on changing school names rather than getting children back into classrooms amid the pandemic.

Amid the backlash and legal challenges, the board is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a resolution to rescind its renaming decision and revisit it after all students have returned full-time to in-person learning.

Rather than addressing the criticism, the resolution says it “wishes to avoid the distraction and wasteful expenditure of public funds in frivolous litigation.”

The board’s president, Gabriela Lopez, had already paused the renaming process in February after admitting the anti-racism push had been rushed.

“I acknowledge and take responsibility that mistakes were made in the renaming process,” Lopez wrote in an op-ed for the Chronicle at the time.

A plaque for Roosevelt Middle School is seen outside the school in San Francisco, on Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2021.
A plaque for Roosevelt Middle School outside the school in San Francisco, on Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2021.
AP Photo/Haven Daley

Any future efforts would involve “engaging historians at nearby universities to help” to avoid future errors, she said.

Mistakes included wrongly accusing Paul Revere of seeking to colonize the Penobscot people, and confusing the name of Alamo Elementary School with the Texas battle rather than the Spanish word for “poplar tree.”

As well as historical figures, longtime Sen. Dianne Feinstein was also on the list because as mayor in 1984, she had replaced a vandalized Confederate flag that was part of a longstanding display outside City Hall.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein was also on the list of name removals because as mayor in 1984 she had replaced a vandalized Confederate flag.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein was also on the list of name removals because as mayor in 1984, she had replaced a vandalized Confederate flag.
AP Photo/Jeff Chiu, File

Tuesday’s vote precedes an April 16 deadline given in a San Francisco Superior Court ruling to either rescind the vote or show why the board shouldn’t be compelled to do so.

With Post wires



Source link

San Francisco board to reverse plan to rename 44 schools over social issues

The San Francisco school board is set to vote Tuesday to reverse its much criticized decision to rename 44 schools named after historical figures and others linked to racism and other social injustices – as the school system was locked down because of the pandemic.

The reversal is intended to avoid costly litigation and calm the backlash over what critics say was ill-timed activism, especially as the school system was shuttered during the school system with no definitive plan to reopen, according to the Associated Press.

The entire school system remains closed roughly two months after the city’s elected Board of Education voted to strip some schools of the names of historic figures including Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Robert Louis Stevenson. A school named for longtime Sen. Democratic Dianne Feinstein is also on the list.

Democratic Mayor London Breed called the plan and its timing “offensive and completely unacceptable” for the board to focus on changing school names rather than getting children back into classrooms, the wire service also reports. 

Some of the city’s youngest students are expected to begin returning to in-person instruction this month after more than a year of distance learning because of the pandemic. There is no timetable for middle and high school students to return.

Feinstein Elementary made the list because when she was mayor in 1984, she initially replaced a vandalized Confederate flag that was part of a longstanding display outside City Hall, the Associated Press also reports.

The board is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a resolution to rescind its January decision and revisit the matter after all students have returned full time to in-person learning.

Since the renaming vote, the board has faced multiple lawsuits, including one from City Hall and the mayor to pressure the school district and board to reopen classrooms more quickly, the wire service also reports.



Source link

Is SCOTUS Getting Ready to Reverse the Sixth Circuit in a Habeas Case Yet Again? – Reason.com

This morning the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Brown v. Davenport, in which Michigan sought review of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s decision to grant a writ of habeas corpus to Ervine Lee Davenport. Grants in cases like this are often an indication that a majority of the Court plans to reverse, and that is particularly so when the Court grants certiorari to a habeas decision from the Sixth Circuit.

A divided panel granted Davenport’s habeas petition because he was visibly (and unconstitutionally) shackled during his trial for first-degree murder, rejecting the state’s arguments that the shackling was not prejudicial and a habeas grant was not authorized under AEDPA. Michigan sought en banc review, and the court split 8-7, with two judges (Sutton and Kethledge) writing that the panel decision was wrong, but not en banc worthy. In other words, a clear majority of the Sixth Circuit concluded the panel was wrong as a matter of law, but only seven sought en banc review.

As I have noted before (most recently last week), the Roberts Court has reversed the Sixth Circuit in habeas cases with some frequency–often unanimously–and with most of those reversals coming in cases (like this one) in which the Sixth Circuit granted the petition. Given this history, and the details of this case, do not be surprised if Brown v. Davenport produces another Sixth Circuit reversal.



Source link