Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures (Exaggerated records?)

Skip to comments.

Top scientists start to examine fiddled global warming figures (Exaggerated records?)

The Telegraph ^

| 4/25/2015
| Christopher Booker

Posted on 04/26/2015 4:58:36 PM PDT by Beave Meister

Last month, we are told, the world enjoyed “its hottest March since records began in 1880”. This year, according to “US government scientists”, already bids to outrank 2014 as “the hottest ever”. The figures from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) were based, like all the other three official surface temperature records on which the world’s scientists and politicians rely, on data compiled from a network of weather stations by NOAA’s

Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN). But here there is a puzzle. These temperature records are not the only ones with official status. The other two, Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the University of Alabama (UAH), are based on a quite different method of measuring temperature data, by satellites. And these, as they have increasingly done in recent years, give a strikingly different picture. Neither shows last month as anything like the hottest March on record, any more than they showed 2014 as “the hottest year ever”.

(Excerpt)

TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: algore; climatechange; climategate; corruption; fraud; ghcn; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; hidethedecline; hockeystick; liberals; lyingliberalliars; noaa; popefrancis; romancatholicism; rss; science; scientist; uah

To: Beave Meister

posted on 04/26/2015 5:01:07 PM PDT
by Beave Meister
(Die Hard Cubs Fan…..if it takes forever.)

To: Beave Meister

Adjusted graph:

Raw Data:

posted on 04/26/2015 5:01:53 PM PDT
by RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)

To: Beave Meister

The greatest threat to the planet and humans is government. Always has been, always will be. It directly killed over 100 million just last century. As best as we can figure global warming will be a wash. Some areas lose while others win. Global cooling on the other hand only causes wide spread losses.

posted on 04/26/2015 5:05:28 PM PDT
by justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)

To: Beave Meister

The larger the computer model the larger the GIGO (garbage in / garbage out) errors become.

posted on 04/26/2015 5:11:50 PM PDT
by fella
(“As it was before Noah so shall it be again,”)

To: Beave Meister

Communist scu*bags with their hands on the levers of
power; oh so bad for humanity.


posted on 04/26/2015 5:14:11 PM PDT
by ripley

To: Beave Meister

I have been on this article discussion for hours.

It’s really fun.


posted on 04/26/2015 5:19:05 PM PDT
by glasseye

To: Beave Meister

Weren’t the ones who put out this fiddled crap supposedly “top scientists”?

posted on 04/26/2015 5:22:42 PM PDT
by bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)

To: Beave Meister

posted on 04/26/2015 5:23:03 PM PDT
by Inyo-Mono

To: Beave Meister

Scientists can be fooled by spoon benders.

posted on 04/26/2015 5:38:02 PM PDT
by Paladin2

To: RightGeek

Follow the money. This is all about redistribution of wealth and crony capitalism. The “rich” countries are expected to transfer billions of dollars to the developing world to help them cope with climate change. No doubt these green energy companies will receive billions in contracts. And governments will expand control over our everyday lives. GW is just a pretext for all of this.

posted on 04/26/2015 5:45:47 PM PDT
by kabar

To: Beave Meister

posted on 04/26/2015 6:12:11 PM PDT
by Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)

To: Beave Meister

posted on 04/26/2015 6:34:24 PM PDT
by ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ – a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])

To: Paladin2

posted on 04/26/2015 7:19:59 PM PDT
by Ditto

To: Beave Meister

The scam is beginning to unravel.

posted on 04/26/2015 9:08:27 PM PDT
by TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)

To: glasseye

Hi, I am a new member,and when I tried to use my usual “user name” “oneeye” I was informed that it was already in use. When I saw yours,I had to chuckle. That’s one name I never thought to use. Sorry if I’m off topic,but too new to PM someone. Did you have any trouble with getting the user name you wanted when you first registered? And how were you able to comment at the Telegraph on that article. I saw that they had over 42,000 comments. Yikes!

To: General Chang

The discussion forum they use over there is ‘Disqus’. You have to register to use it, but then you can post on many other web sites that use Disqus.

posted on 04/27/2015 9:32:25 AM PDT
by glasseye

Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works. is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson

Source link

Recommended Posts

No comment yet, add your voice below!

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *